Tag Archives: Siris

Anima Forma Corporis

On my principles, can one say “anima forma corporis” (the soul is the form of the body)? Doesn’t that require a kind of dualism of soul from body that I’m trying to abjure? I don’t think so. “Form” is equivalent … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Natural Teleology and Divine Language

There’s a deep intimacy between Aquinas’s proof for the existence of God from natural teleology and Berkeley’s account of the world as divine language. Let’s consider them each in turn, and then reflect a bit on their interrelations. The proof … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shakespearean Berkeley?

One of Berkeley’s most distinctive theses is the claim that the world that appears to us in perception and experiment constitutes a “divine language,” an address from God: “There is a certain analogy, constancy, and uniformity in the phaenomena or … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment