Category Archives: David Hart

Brandom vs. the Idealists on “Causal Intermediaries”

Despite their many similarities, Brandom flags one point of disagreement with McDowell: I do not see that we need – either in epistemology or, more important, in semantics – to appeal to any intermediaries between perceptual facts and reports of … Continue reading

Posted in David Hart, Empiricism, Epistemology, George Berkeley, Idealism, John McDowell, Leibniz, Naturalism, Robert Brandom | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ramanuja, Aurobindo, and Hart on the One and the Many

Shankara is a famous advocate for a fully monist interpretation of the Upanishads and the Vedanta philosophy that developed from it. For instance: “The difference between the individual self and the highest Lord is owing to wrong knowledge only” (1.3.19,Sourcebook of Indian Philosophy, 515). … Continue reading

Posted in David B. Hart, David Hart, Hinduism, Ramanuja, Sarvapelli Radhakrishnan, Shankara, The One and the Many, Trinity, Upanishads | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Romans 9-11 in Outline

Rom 9:1-5 – Paul laments the unbelief of Israel, notwithstanding her many spiritual blessings (cf. Rom 3:1-4). Rom 9:6-13 – Israel’s unbelief does not frustrate the “word of God,” b/c “they are not all Israel, which are of Israel” (9:6); … Continue reading

Posted in David B. Hart, David Hart, Election, Israel, Paul, Romans, Salvaton, Soteriology, St. Paul | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paul’s Universalism?

As David Hart observed recently, Romans 5:18 is a verse with hard-to-avoid universalist implications: “ἄρα οὖν ὡς δι’ ἑνὸς παραπτώματος εἰς πάντας ἀνθρώπους εἰς κατάκριμα οὕτως καὶ δι’ ἑνὸς δικαιώματος εἰς πάντας ἀνθρώπους εἰς δικαίωσιν ζωῆς.” (“Therefore as by the offence … Continue reading

Posted in Augustine, David Hart, Paul, Romans, St. Paul, Universalism | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is God eternally “Lord”?

Augustine says No, for the following reason: “Ecce, Dominum esse non sempiternum habet, ne cogamur etiam sempiternam creaturam dicere, quia ille sempiterne non dominaretur, nisi etaim ista famularetur” (De Trin. V.16.17). Translated: “Look, he can’t be ‘Lord’ eternally, lest we … Continue reading

Posted in Augustine, Creation, David Hart, Election, Eternity, Karl Barth, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Creatures as pure accident

” Sans doute, quand il s’agit des créature muables et changeantes, ce qui ne se dit pas de la substance, se dit de l’accident, car en elles tout est accidentel, la grandeur et les autres qualités, puisque ces qualités sont susceptibles … Continue reading

Posted in Augustine, Being and beings, David Hart, Gregory of Nyssa, Immutability, Jonathan Edwards, Robert Jenson, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment