Newman and Epictetus

In his Idea of a University, Newman offers the following (stipulative) definition of “Philosophy,” the “science of sciences”: “the comprehension of the bearings of one science on another, and the use of each to each, and the location and limitation and adjustment and due appreciation of them all, one with another, this belongs” (3.4, cf. 5.2). Philosophy for Newman covers much the same ground as “logic” does in Epictetus’s Discourses, where it is a discourse that contemplates and evaluates both itself and all other discourses (1.1.1-6). I’m not quite happy with this way of sorting human inquiry, since it puts an essentially secular discipline on a higher plane even than theology (as to scope, if not as to certainty; this is a point about which Newman is quite explicit, cf. Idea 3.4). It might be interesting to contrast Newman’s view with Aquinas’s ordering of the disciplines, with theology, as “regina disciplinarum,” subaltern only to the “scientia Dei et beatorum” (ST I.1.1.c., I.1.5.ad 2).

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s