Did the Son of God assume a human being?

Strange though it might seem, Aquinas says “No” (ST III.4.3.c.). The Son assumes our human nature, and that nature is united with the divine in the very person of the Son, which means that the man Jesus isn’t assumed by the Son (that’s adoptionism), he is the Son. A human being, Aquinas cautions, “significat humanam naturam prout est nata in supposito esse” (Ibid.); but there is only one subject (suppositum, hypostasis) in Jesus, namely the person of God the Son. Talk about the economic Trinity being the immanent!

This article offers a nice instance of Aquinas’s approach to disagreeing with Augustine. In an objection, he quotes the good bishop as writing (pre-Ephesus, of course), “filius Dei hominem assumpsit” (ST III.4.3.1). Aquinas deals with this by counseling a generous hermeneutic: “huiusmodi locutiones non sunt extendendae, tanquam propriae, sed pie sunt exponendae, ubicumque a sacris doctoribus ponuntur” (Ibid., ad 1).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s