The Epistemological Liability of Church Division

After the divisions, “any arguments that hoped realistically to avoid the quagmire of theological controversy and fruitfully to transcend confessional boundaries — including discussion about God and his creation — would have to bracket both the content of the contested claims and the disputed bases to which antagonists appealed. The consequences were profound. Ecclesiastical authority, tradition, scripture, and religious experience were all out of bounds, despite the fact that most Protestants still shared many beliefs with Catholics. Also excluded was God’s self-revelation as disclosed in his extraordinary actions in history, because Christians disagreed about the meaning and ramifications of these actions” (Gregory, The Unintended Reformation, 47).

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Church Division, Knowledge, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s