Behavioral Economics and Augustinian Anthropology

Behavioral economists, such as Dan Ariely here at Duke, are uncovering by inductive, double-blind experiments what inductive, deliberate reflection revealed to a host of classic thinkers, from Aristotle and Augustine all the way down to the twentieth century. At least, so it  seems to me.

Here’s an interesting example, on the weaknesses of introspection as a predictive tool:

“We all systematically underpredict the degree to which arousal completely negates our superego, and the way emotions can take control of our behavior” (Predicatably Irrational, p. 99).

“Comme presque tout echappe a l’observation de soi, on ne peut tirer de l’instrospection des conclusions generales” (Simone Weil, Lecons de philosophie, 4).

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Behavioral economics, Choice, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s