Hart on creation sounds like Jenson

I think of these two as engaged in a monumental struggle over the mechanics of the Trinity, but on the ground, they sound remarkably alike. Take Hart on creation:

“Creation is thus without foundations; it attends God, possessing no essence apart from its character as a free and open utterance within the infinity of his self-utterance. In creation God, who is never without his Word, nevertheless utters himself ‘outward’ to that which has being only because God’s address can never be without reply (Isa. 55:11)” (TBotI 252).

Hart and Jenson concur on:

1. Abolishing the meaningful distinction of essence and accident — as creatures, we are accident all the way down.

2. Understanding creation as suspended in the mutual discourse of the Trinity.

3. Understanding the being of creation as a “reply” to God’s beckoning call — that God’s creative word must have its response is creation’s stability.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Being and beings, Creation, David B. Hart, Holy Trinity, Robert Jenson, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s