Hart on creation sounds like Jenson

I think of these two as engaged in a monumental struggle over the mechanics of the Trinity, but on the ground, they sound remarkably alike. Take Hart on creation:

“Creation is thus without foundations; it attends God, possessing no essence apart from its character as a free and open utterance within the infinity of his self-utterance. In creation God, who is never without his Word, nevertheless utters himself ‘outward’ to that which has being only because God’s address can never be without reply (Isa. 55:11)” (TBotI 252).

Hart and Jenson concur on:

1. Abolishing the meaningful distinction of essence and accident — as creatures, we are accident all the way down.

2. Understanding creation as suspended in the mutual discourse of the Trinity.

3. Understanding the being of creation as a “reply” to God’s beckoning call — that God’s creative word must have its response is creation’s stability.

This entry was posted in Being and beings, Creation, David B. Hart, Holy Trinity, Robert Jenson, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s